Following a failed negotiation, 1100 union employees at NYTimes went on strike.


After failing to reach an agreement with the news publisher, the staff of the New York Times decided to go on strike for 24 hours.

Since they were unable to reach an agreement on a “complete and equitable contract” with the news organization, more than 1,100 union employees at the New York Times Co. decided to take a one-day strike on December 8. This would be the newspaper’s first similar strike in more than 40 years.

The NewsGuild of New York’s newsroom employees and other union members expressed their frustration with the prolonged bargaining process since their previous contract expired in March 2021. More than 1,100 workers will stage a 24-hour work stoppage beginning at 12:01 a.m. Thursday, according to a union announcement made last week, unless the two sides come to a contract agreement.

The NewsGuild stated in a tweet that “more than 1100 New York Times employees are now officially on strike, the first of this size at the corporation in four decades. Refusing to do work you enjoy is never an easy choice, but our members are prepared to go the extra mile to ensure that everyone in the newsroom has a better experience.”


A New York Times spokesperson expressed the company’s “disappointment” in a statement “that there was a strike threat from the NewsGuild.

“We are ready to make sure that the Times serves our readers uninterruptedly, “said a Times representative.

According to a report from the Associated Press, talks did occur on Tuesday and in part on Wednesday, but the parties’ positions on key subjects like pay raises and remote-work practices were still very different.

The union tweeted on Wednesday night that a deal had not been reached and that the walkout was taking place. It stated: “We were prepared to work as long as it took to reach a fair agreement, but management left the table with five hours left.”

“We are aware of our value, “the union tacked on

Uncertainty remained regarding how Thursday’s reporting would be impacted, but the fast-paced live-news desk, which covers breaking news for the digital paper, is among the strike’s supporters. The workers had organized a rally for that afternoon in front of the Times Square offices of the newspaper.

The Associated Press was informed by Danielle Rhoades Ha, a New York Times spokesman, that the firm has “strong preparations in place.” “to keep putting out content, which may entail using foreign correspondents and other journalists who are not union members.

Deputy Managing Editor Cliff Levy called the planned strike “puzzling” and “an uneasy point in negotiations over a new contract” in a note issued to guild-represented personnel on Tuesday night. He stated that it would be the bargaining unit’s first strike since 1981 and that it “comes despite the company’s intensified efforts to achieve headway.”

However, the NewsGuild claimed in a statement signed by over 1,000 workers that management had been “dragging its feet” in contract negotiations for almost two years and that “time is running out to negotiate a fair deal” by the end of the year.

The NewsGuild further claimed that the employer informed workers who planned to strike that they would not be paid during the strike. In order to complete their work before the strike, members were also reportedly asked to put in extra time.

“I’m sorry to share that negotiations with the Times collapsed tonight when the company walked off the table,” a New York Times reporter tweeted. I will join more than 1,000 of my coworkers in a 24-hour walkout that will begin tonight.

“It is painful to have to stand with over 1,200 colleagues who give their all for the success of this place, hat in hand, asking @nytimes to show us they value us,” a different journalist said. However, here we are. Even though I’m upset, I’ve never been more pleased to be in such excellent company.

Other, shorter walkouts have also occurred recently at The New York Times, including a half-day protest in August by a newly formed union representing technology workers who complained of unfair labor practices.

Another news:-

Twitter poll voted to restore Trump’s account

One notable development, hailed by both parties, was the company’s withdrawal of its proposal to replace the current flexible pension scheme with an improved 401 (k) retirement plan. The Times proposed that the union pick one out of the two options instead. The business also consented to increase benefits for fertility treatments.

According to Levy, the business has also offered to increase salaries by 5.5 percent after the contract is approved, with subsequent increases of 3 percent scheduled for 2023 and 2024. That would be more than the 2.2 percent annual increase in the contract that was about to expire.

Stacy Cowley, a finance reporter, and union representative, told AP that the union is seeking 10 percent pay raises at ratification, which she said would make up for raises not received over the past two years.

She added that while the company wants the right to call workers back to the office full-time, the union wants the contract to guarantee employees the option to work remotely some of the time if their roles allow it. According to Cowley, the Times has required employees to work three days a week, but many have been coming in less frequently as a form of informal protest.

Leave a comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More